Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Maastricht Graduate School of Governance

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗plicit 11:30, 5 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Maastricht Graduate School of Governance[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

My PROD nomination was unfortunately removed with the suggestion it should be a PROMERGE. However, I don't believe any information from this page should be merged into the other page, as it already mentions his school proportionally. This article reads like promotion for the school and includes texts that are clearly taken from the website (borders copyright violation). Furthermore, I don't believe this school is relevant outside a mention on the page of the university (which is already the case). Dajasj (talk) 08:20, 22 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. Dajasj (talk) 08:20, 22 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Netherlands-related deletion discussions. Dajasj (talk) 08:20, 22 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 08:28, 22 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Daniel (talk) 04:27, 29 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Looks like an admission brochure. - Hatchens (talk) 11:59, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete It reads like an add for the school, from what I can tell isn't notable, and is already mentioned in the article that has been mentioned as a possible merge target. Not that there's anything worth merging anyway. So deleting it outright is the best option IMO. --Adamant1 (talk) 01:04, 5 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.