Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Maartje Nevejan

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Nomination withdrawn. Non-admin closure. ^walk victor falk^talk 11:44, 17 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Maartje Nevejan[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

~~Unreferenced BLP, no evidence of notability, prod removed by User:Calliopejen1 –– Jezhotwells (talk) 16:46, 4 July 2010 (UTC)~~ [reply]

~~Can only find facebook, wiki mirrors and personal home page. –– Jezhotwells (talk) 18:36, 4 July 2010 (UTC)~~[reply]

Withdraw: Thanks to excellent work by User:MichaelQSchmidt, sources have now been provided to demonstrate the subject's notability. Please can a non-involved editor close this as keep. –– Jezhotwells (talk) 02:00, 13 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom Nothing solid that i can find to indicate notability. Dr. Blofeld ^{White cat} 11:01, 5 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Clicking "What links here" takes you to the Golden Calf for Best Actress page, itself indication of notability (and verifiable at Nederlands Film Festival Winnaars page). Then a Google Search for "Zilveren Zebra" leads to the page on her "Couscous&Cola" winning the ASN Bank Mediaprijs (Zilveren Zebra), as stated in the Awards section in the article. So while the article itself is woeful in formatting, notability is verifiable. AllyD (talk) 16:48, 5 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Netherlands-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 20:16, 5 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 20:16, 5 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Comment The Find sources above return some Dutch language sources[1] which will require translation, and the awards seem to meet WP:ANYBIO. The article will require cleanup and better sourcing. Is it do-able?Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 03:03, 6 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:04, 11 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Notability asserted. Sources available. Article now being improved. Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 05:49, 12 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.