Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Maa Basuli

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ♠PMC(talk) 21:27, 14 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Maa Basuli[edit]

Maa Basuli (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Written in Odia (per Google Translator). Bits of lore associated with a goddess and a temple collected in a rambling fashion, likely to defy any translator who doesn't want to spend all that time to yield an unencyclopedic result. Very subjective, no indication that it's legend, though it appears to be. No sources and, in fact, the third sentence begins "There is no historical evidence, but it is certain that ...." I don't know whether this goddess is widespread or a product of a local cult, but the latter is suggested by the fact that Google returns only 62 hits for it in Roman letters and 22 when written in Odia (ମା ବାଶୁଳୀ ). Previously PRODded, then recreated as a draft and then moved to article space. Largoplazo (talk) 21:04, 7 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per nom. Not notable. Waddles 🗩 🖉 00:43, 8 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete, per nom. Lectonar (talk) 15:42, 9 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete or Draftify. Not appropriate for article space in the English Wikipedia. – Jonesey95 (talk) 15:45, 10 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Because the article was already moved to draft space and its creator moved it back unchanged, there's no reason to expect anything other than that if it were draftified again, the creator would again return it to article space. Largoplazo (talk) 15:52, 10 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Non notable regional variation. desmay (talk) 18:52, 10 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.