Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ma Sik Road

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Fanling-Sheung Shui New Town. Consensus is to non-controversially redirect the article to Fanling-Sheung Shui New Town Malinaccier (talk) 05:28, 3 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ma Sik Road[edit]

Ma Sik Road (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Insignificant landmark. Article creator already removed CSD and PROD. — IVORK Discuss 07:22, 18 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Hong Kong-related deletion discussions. Jupitus Smart 08:40, 18 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment - The article was just created a few hours ago. Can you wait? STSC (talk) 09:06, 18 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 01:54, 23 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Redirect??
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Winged Blades Godric 05:22, 26 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete because this is in immediate violations of WP:Not guide given we are not a travel listing and, since this article contains 1 sentence with this exactly in mind, there's nothing to salvage in a policy-backed setting. As with any article, it can therefore be added at another article, but to actually keep something when it's clear there's no serious significance or improvements is contrary to policy. Simply because the ChineseWiki has not deleted theirs is not a securable defense since we have the highest standards of encyclopedia process here, and that can supersede. To quote WP:Deletion policy, Any other content not suitable for an encyclopedia which is exactly what this is and it also explicitly says this applies to all content. SwisterTwister talk 05:15, 1 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
and merge what content? Or on what policy? WP:Not clearly says we are not a trivia or travel guide. SwisterTwister talk 16:34, 1 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Just merge the description of Ma Sik Road into 'Fanling-Sheung Shui new town' per WP:ATD-M, and it would not become a travel guide as defined in WP:NOTTRAVEL. STSC (talk) 20:12, 1 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.