Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ma Jaya

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Recommend adding some of the sources listed in this AfD to the article itself. Fabrictramp | talk to me 20:59, 21 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ma Jaya[edit]

Non notable religious leader, no reliable sources. Thanks. Ism schism (talk) 13:46, 12 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Religion-related deletion discussions. — Ism schism (talk) 13:48, 12 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Hinduism-related deletion discussions. — John Z (talk) 07:19, 13 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - There are numerous sources on the subject [1]. Please make some effort to improve articles by citing sources rather than tag them for deletion. ≈ jossi ≈ (talk) 17:49, 12 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per above. The onus on providing references belongs to the article's creator and to anyone who wants to take on the task. In this case, I do not. - House of Scandal (talk) 20:04, 12 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The lack of references in an article is not a reason for deletion. The lack of source for a subject is. You may need to re-read WP:DELETE ≈ jossi ≈ (talk) 05:44, 17 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. She appears in a significant amount of news articles [2] and appears notable. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Benjaminx (talk • contribs) 23:37, 12 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'm likely to change my opinion after such sources are added to the article. - House of Scandal (talk) 23:46, 12 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Whether references proving notability are in an article or not is irrelevant to notability and AfD, although of course getting content backed up by reliable refs is the ulitmate goal.John Z (talk) 07:21, 13 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Weak keep, if reliable sources are added to the article. ~ priyanath talk 03:12, 15 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.