Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/M Moser Associates

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Courcelles (talk) 21:48, 28 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

M Moser Associates[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I declined A7, because the size of the firm implies some importance. It would probably be possible to find sourcing, but this is clearly a directory entry by COI editors. DGG ( talk ) 05:06, 13 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Standard searches do not reveal enough significant coverage in independent reliable sources. -- 1Wiki8Q5G7FviTHBac3dx8HhdNYwDVstR (talk) 09:49, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 16:29, 20 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of China-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:39, 25 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Hong Kong-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:39, 25 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:39, 25 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:39, 25 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete for now as although "M Moser Associates Hong Kong company" found some links at Books and News, there's nothing to suggest outstandingly better. The current article is unfortunately not acceptable and needs to restarted when better...which is not now. SwisterTwister talk 06:01, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, couldn't find anything on searches to show they meet either WP:GNG or WP:NCORP. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:37, 28 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.