Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/MV Lady Mary Joy 3

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Mkdw ^talk 06:05, 26 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

MV Lady Mary Joy 3[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG. Only sources are a primary source, and a database that lists all ships in the world. I propose a redirect to Aleson Shipping Lines. Ramaksoud2000 ^{(Talk to me)} 07:27, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I withdraw this nomination. An incident that generated coverage of the ship has been added to the article. Since someone else has supported deletion, according to WP:WDAFD I cannot close this myself, but I don't believe anybody else will support deletion. Ramaksoud2000 ^{(Talk to me)} 09:24, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Ramaksoud2000, kindly check your talk page and please see this article thoroughly. It has sources on databases that lists allships in the world. Bumbl_loid 07:42, 11 December 2016 (UTC)

I have replied on my talkpage to avoid fragmenting the discussion. Ramaksoud2000 ^{(Talk to me)} 07:46, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete or redirect. No evidence that this vessel has any inherent notability. Velella ^{Velella Talk} 08:37, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Give me time to edit this article. Adding more words and news articke related to MV Lady Mary Joy 3 can help. Give me at least 30 minutes. Bumbl_loid 08:42, 11 December 2016 (UTC)

New additions to the article was done, hoping to help the article not to be deleted. Bumbl_loid 09:12, 11 December 2016 (UTC)

Keep passes WP:GNG per the sources added by the user above. AlessandroTiandelli333 (talk) 11:59, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - a ship tracking site, the owners own web-site and peripheral mentions as the ship repatriating illegal immigrants does NOT amount to notability. If that were so, pretty well every ship on the oceans of the world would quality. Velella ^{Velella Talk} 01:55, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 16:26, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - the ship exists, reliable sources prove the fact. Article needs improvement but that is not a reason to delete. Mjroots (talk) 12:52, 19 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per deletion nominator's withdrawal and per judgments of Mjroots and others. --do ncr am 23:07, 19 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.