Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/MUN Society Belgium

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:27, 12 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

MUN Society Belgium[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The article lacks notability and there are accusations of evident autobiography by an editor with close connection to this subject. The coverage of the topic is not significant in third-party sources. Chiserc (talk) 22:02, 22 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Chiserc (talk) 22:02, 22 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations, Education, and Belgium. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 22:42, 22 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:02, 29 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 15:24, 31 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Not a well-written article, so sympathise with the nom, but the MUN Society Belgium seems notable with SIGCOV pieces in quality RS in Belgium like: The Brussels Times, the La Libre Belgique, the L'Echo, and even being received by the Belgian Monarchy. There is more if needed? Aszx5000 (talk) 17:00, 5 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 23:46, 5 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per Aszx5000 and their sources. @Chiserc: Please remember to conduct WP:BEFORE searches before nominating an article for deletion, to ensure that there are not reliable sources for it. JML1148 (talk | contribs) 06:55, 6 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per sources given. The person who loves reading (talk) 21:48, 10 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.