Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/MTI Countdowns

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Uncontested after more than two weeks. – Juliancolton | Talk 00:43, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

MTI Countdowns[edit]

MTI Countdowns (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Delete. Article, based entirely on the topic's own primary source content about itself rather than reliable source coverage in media, about a "record chart" podcast. No indication is given here of the chart's methodology -- whether it goes by IFPI-certified charts and would thus be a valid source for real chart positions, or whether it just uses its own random process to compile a self-created BADCHART -- and so there can be no automatic presumption of notability, just because it exists, in the absence of enough reliable source coverage to pass WP:GNG. Bearcat (talk) 16:23, 27 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Radio-related deletion discussions. Bearcat (talk) 15:23, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. Bearcat (talk) 15:23, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete – per nominator. Lacks in-depth coverage in multiple reliable secondary sources, as required by our notability criteria. Citobun (talk) 12:24, 2 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, King of ♠ 03:23, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.