Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/MSM-03 Gogg (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Feel free to redirect if appropriate. Rjd0060 (talk) 18:10, 16 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

MSM-03 Gogg[edit]

A similar article Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/MSM-03_Gogg was deleted a year ago. I'm not an admin so I can't tell how similar this article is to the old one, but it suffers from the same flaw. Namely, No reliable secondary sources to establish notability or provide real world context. Reyk _YO! 02:11, 11 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Merge and redirect into Mobile weapons, which is a page on these (and is itself a mess because it describes this stuff in-universe). --Falcon Darkstar Kirtaran (talk) 02:21, 11 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete FailsWP:N and is an "in-universe" article about a Gundam gizmo. Edison (talk) 02:23, 11 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Mobile weapons. Not notable enough to merit an individual article.--T B C ♣§♠ (aka Tree Biting Conspiracy) 04:29, 11 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - and a Comment - Mobile weapons is an in-universe article? Can it at least be moved to Mobile weapons in Gundam or something? I would expect an article called 'mobile weapons' to be about real-world self-propelled missile launchers and the like. AlexTiefling (talk) 12:11, 11 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - still fails WP:N. --Oscarthecat (talk) 19:30, 11 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Entirely in-universe information about a fictional device which has not received substantial coverage from reliable sources independent of the subject. Doctorfluffy (robe and wizard hat) 21:03, 11 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to List of Gundam Universal Century mobile units#Principality of Zeon or to Mobile weapons#Mobile armour in the Universal Century. List the variants there too. --Polaron | Talk 01:51, 12 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Merge to either of the articles Polaron suggests. Edward321 (talk) 02:24, 12 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect as suggested by Polaron Gelmax (talk) 19:06, 13 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.