Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/MOORvision Network

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Geschichte (talk) 07:38, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

MOORvision Network[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NCORP. scope_creep^Talk 11:06, 9 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 12:02, 9 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 12:02, 9 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 12:02, 9 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 12:02, 9 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as PRODer - my concern remains that this does not pass any of the primary criteria at NCORP; the sources are largely not reliable or independent and do not establish the significance of this company in its field Spiderone 17:39, 9 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A lot of them fail WP:SIRS.

Delete per WP:MILL. There are now thousands of streaming services, but this is especially ordinary. It has 0.001492 Wheatons of followers on Twitter. Bearian (talk) 20:17, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.