Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/MIND POWER aim for goal attainment

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was obvious delete Shii (tock) 14:25, 13 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

MIND POWER aim for goal attainment[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable book. WP:BEFORE check doesn't offer anything not released by the author. Sales claims are dubious (Neilsen Bookdata doesn't corroborate them). Fails WP:GNG due to lack of coverage and WP:NBOOK due to lack of verifiable info. Yunshui 雲‍水 10:43, 13 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. I love being able to rescue books, but there's no reliable sources out there that shows that this book or its author are notable. I don't see where the book is available for sale anyplace other than the author's weebly site or where any of the people that have praised the book on said weebly site have been quoted anywhere other than on various primary sources.Tokyogirl79 (talk) 11:09, 13 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Dengero (talk) 11:53, 13 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Verging on WP:SPAM, no evidence of notability. AndrewWTaylor (talk) 12:13, 13 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. DOn't see anything notable about it. --Rsrikanth05 (talk) 12:17, 13 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. A self-promo in all likelihood, no proper sources to indicate real notability. Lynch 7 14:22, 13 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.