Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/MIKTA

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 08:14, 19 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

MIKTA[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Whilst I find some sources - such as https://www.tepav.org.tr/en/haberler/s/10595 I am not sure there are enough good sources to show the subject is notable Chidgk1 (talk) 14:10, 5 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Indonesia, South Korea, Turkey, Australia, and Mexico. Chidgk1 (talk) 14:10, 5 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 18:26, 5 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Don't delete it man. Bourenane Chahine (talk) 16:19, 11 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Bourenane Chahine Why keep it? Chidgk1 (talk) 17:09, 11 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 07:59, 12 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep The group is mentioned on websites operated by the individual countries (for instance Australia, Korea, Turkey, Indonesia, Mexico). Of course, these links could be regarded as primary/non-independent sources, but they do show that the group is active and relevant to these governments. More importantly, its purpose is discussed by the UNDP in Seoul [1] and it also received coverage by the Council on Foreign Relations [2], the journal Global Summitry [3], The Diplomat [4], the Georgetown Journal of International Affairs [5] and so on. There's plenty more using a basic Google check. A Google News search also provides regular coverage of the group's activities. Pichpich (talk) 22:55, 14 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per the sources found here. toobigtokale (talk) 00:50, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

KeepPackerfan386beer here 18:48, 18 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.