Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/MELERIGAMY

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete--Ymblanter (talk) 16:55, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

MELERIGAMY[edit]

MELERIGAMY (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I find no coverage in online reliable sources. Doesn't appear to meet the general notability guidelines. Perhaps there's more in another language, but based on the spelling used in this article, even verifiability is a problem. —Largo Plazo (talk) 23:14, 13 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. Human3015TALK  23:31, 13 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Europe-related deletion discussions. North America1000 21:39, 15 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Sam Sailor Talk! 01:56, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. The whole idea about it being "an ancient, European Tantric method" is in lack of better words far out. As far as I know there has been no historical European analogue to Tantra. From all I can tell this is a hoax: no sources prior to 2010 mentions melerigamy or melerigami. A few sources have the Sanskrit spelling "मेलेरीगामी". But then it would not be "invented in Europe". If "मेलेरीगामी" was a genuine word we would get hits on older literature, and we don't. The few sources after 2010 are not sufficient to build an article. -- Sam Sailor Talk! 02:16, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - no reliable sources whatsoever МандичкаYO 😜 06:10, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.