Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/MChat!

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. czar 04:09, 22 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

MChat![edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not notable Mccapra (talk) 11:00, 8 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 12:03, 8 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sweden-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 12:04, 8 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 12:04, 8 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Cannot find evidence of notability, or even existence, other than product's website. Page appears to have been created by product owner's now-blocked WP account. WP:NOTPROMO. --Hobbes Goodyear (talk) 01:13, 15 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ifnord (talk) 05:19, 15 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I wonder, does "MChat" really exist? I tried to find the resources but they're coming from the personal weblogs dependently. Farooqahmadbhat (talk) 05:37, 15 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: A WP:SPA article by Dmr chat with no declared COI. This looks like a semi-realised project, with pages on the website "under constraction", and I am finding no evidence that it ever attained WP:NWEB/WP:GNG notability. AllyD (talk) 09:01, 15 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Appears to be simple promotion of the chat. Lacks any report by third party sources. –Ammarpad (talk) 12:06, 18 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.