Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/MC2 Biotek

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. with no prejudice against speedy renomination (non-admin closure) czar ♔ 04:44, 17 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

MC2 Biotek[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Delete, when searching I find very basic information for investing and frankly there isn't a lot of results in either web or news search. I don't believe it passes WP:CORP. If others find significant RS I am not opposed to withdraw the nom but for now my searches turn up little. Hell In A Bucket (talk) 13:06, 26 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Courcelles 15:11, 26 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Denmark-related deletion discussions. Courcelles 15:11, 26 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 02:47, 3 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Current sources are somewhat problematic, but there are clear claims of notability and further sources available. --Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 12:21, 3 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 04:15, 10 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.