Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/MAKO Model

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Arbitrarily0 ^(talk) 14:19, 31 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

MAKO Model[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Essay of original thoughts of the author. Gigs (talk) 18:41, 13 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Due to an edit conflict I also nominated this for deletion with the rationale: "Article about a business model placed by the creator of the model and with no references or indication of notability. PROD legitimately contested by the author; speedy tag also removed but the criterion did not apply; possibly speedy deletable as db-spam, though. Fails WP:V, WP:N and WP:OR". I42 (talk) 18:47, 13 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as original research. NawlinWiki (talk) 18:58, 13 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete The first line clearly indicates that it's original research ("named after a shark for which I have a mysterious liking") Netalarm^talk 19:16, 13 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The acronym MAKO was derived from a shark, not the Model itself. It is based on IT Governance and the need for identifying roles and responsibilites within IT Governance and the oversight of IT. If needed I can source many entities on IT Governance.--Marccrudgington (talk) 19:22, 13 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:52, 13 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, unsourced original research, unencyclopedic. Hairhorn (talk) 21:17, 13 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy deletion Tbhotch^Talk ^C. 21:32, 13 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This AfD nomination was incomplete (missing step 3). It is listed now. DumbBOT (talk) 10:02, 24 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.