Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/M31570

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. To respond to Pagina, an AfD on the basis of non-notability essentially is a request for sourcing. --Sam Blanning^(talk) 23:59, 18 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

M31570[edit]

nn musicians.--Vdbk 17:29, 8 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Strong Delete - blatant self-promotional vanity. Can't find any sources establishing notability. Seems to fail WP:BAND and certainly fails WP:V and WP:OR. My Alt Account 17:47, 8 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Prompt for sources. If this person can indeed be established as "the originator of the genre elektro-tek", and if "electro-tek" can be established as a real genre--and he can be held up to WP:BAND standards, this could be a strong keep. It's possible the author didn't know what criteria had to be established (i.e., record labels, media attention, etc.) Doesn't read like typical bandcruft to me, so I'd ask for sourcing and clean-up before I pulled the plug. --Pagana 05:39, 9 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Since the single assertion of notability, "originator of the genre elektro-tek", still has not been verified by any sources whatsoever, delete as insufficiently notable per WP:MUSIC. --Satori Son 05:18, 18 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.