Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/M.A.C. Black Cola

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Black Kite 10:10, 21 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

M.A.C. Black Cola[edit]

According to WP:NOTE: "A topic is presumed to be notable if it has received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject." I don't beleive this topic has. Rockfang (talk) 21:56, 6 February 2008 (UTC) Also, the article had previously been tagged with a notability template from June '07 with no significant additions/changes as of my prod'ing the article today.--Rockfang (talk) 22:03, 6 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It certainly is notable for the spectacular failure after a massive campaign. It was pre-internet so sources are a bit hard to find, but I've read several articles about it. // Liftarn (talk)
Delete I see the argument to keep, but without sources I can't approve it. Shalom (Hello • Peace) 15:29, 7 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Yes, I see the problem. It's tricky because the newspapers have gone to recycling years ago. // Liftarn (talk)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. -- -- pb30<talk> 15:40, 7 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ···日本穣^{? · Talk to Nihonjoe} 00:19, 15 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete for failure of WP:RS; I can't find any at all. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells•Otter chirps)} 00:30, 15 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: A failure, and not a notable one, if not a hoax. When an article is written with AfD keywords in it, suspicions rise. Utgard Loki (talk) 17:45, 15 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete No evidence any such project even existed. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 18:06, 15 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.