Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/München Berduxstrasse station

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. SarahStierch (talk) 01:23, 6 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

München Berduxstrasse station[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not notable. Even if it may become notable, it'd be preimmature. Kinkreet^{~♥moshi moshi♥~} 10:35, 30 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Keep I'm not sure what you mean by "immature". In most cases, Wikipedia retains articles on railway stations which are tiny (see Lostock Hall railway station) because of the greater notability of the railway network as a whole. If this article is WP:CRYSTALBALL then, yes, it should be deleted. doktorb _words^deeds 11:16, 30 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This station has once been proposed but will most probably not be built within the next decades (or not at all). --FloSch (talk) 11:53, 30 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Danke. I will change my vote doktorb _words^deeds 13:29, 30 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Subject does not exist, it is merely a proposal / idea. Also, no indication of wp:notability, no sources. North8000 (talk) 11:55, 30 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete No indication that the station exists, will exist, or has been proposed to exist at a reasonable time in the short-term. doktorb _words^deeds 13:29, 30 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions. — Frankie (talk) 15:15, 1 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. — Frankie (talk) 15:15, 1 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. This does appear to be premature. I did find some mentions of it: a 2000 regional planning document; a proposal (undated, but uses 2009 Google maps; occurs at the bottom of p. 1); and a July 2011 endorsement by a political party. However, here is the city planning committee appearing to reject it once and for all in January 2011 (pp. 13–14). (That's also the source cited in de:S-Bahn München.) I was unable to find anything in the press. So I don't believe this merits an article unless the political winds shift and the proposal gets (re-)adopted and there is some coverage of a solid plan rather than a proposal. Yngvadottir (talk) 17:21, 1 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.