Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mírzá Mustafá

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Missvain (talk) 02:34, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Mírzá Mustafá[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not qualifies WP:BASIC Serv181920 (talk) 13:53, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Religion-related deletion discussions. Serv181920 (talk) 13:53, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Iraq-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 14:07, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep a named apostle of the founder of the Baha’i faith, equivalent to a Christian apostle or one of the close companions of the prophet Muhammad. Mccapra (talk) 14:09, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - for the non-notable people listed as apostles of Baha'u'llah, a section on the page Apostles of Baháʼu'lláh is sufficient. Cuñado ☼ - Talk 17:26, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep >> I agree with Mccapra. --Nerdtimer (talk) 21:41, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete one source is not enough to justify an article.John Pack Lambert (talk) 18:28, 30 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep as obviously being a topic that any self-respecting general encyclopedia not limited by size should cover. Anyone concerned that there is only one source cited can add others found by clicking on the word "books" above. Phil Bridger (talk) 21:19, 30 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 01:46, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete- I agree with Cunado.Fails WP:GNG Jammu58 (talk) 09:41, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per Mccapra and Phil Bridger. -- Necrothesp (talk) 13:14, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Missvain (talk) 19:00, 7 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep We appear to run into the danger of looking for sourcing in just English. This does appear to be quite notable, and there are plenty of mentions in books on Baha'u'llah.--Concertmusic (talk) 19:29, 7 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per Phil Bridger; clicking on 'books' does indeed show many significant mentions in reputable books Spiderone 20:36, 7 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.