Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/MÜDEK

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Draftify. as an ATD. Liz Read! Talk! 00:22, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

MÜDEK[edit]

MÜDEK (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable org, I find few mentions of them in RS. This appears promotional as well. Oaktree b (talk) 20:45, 20 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Timothytyy (talk) 00:13, 28 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:NOTCATALOG. This non-wiki-style article contains a lot of garbage like "Organizations other than MÜDEK that are authorized to...". However, I'd consider redirect to to Washington_Accord_(credentials). Suitskvarts (talk) 20:12, 28 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 00:53, 7 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.