Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lyro

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. RL0919 (talk) 07:13, 6 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Lyro[edit]

Lyro (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Procedural nomination, since I declined the PROD because the article was previously deleted via PROD in 2007. The nominator was Mccapra (t c) and their reason was: "Short lived non notable social networking site." –Darkwind (talk) 07:07, 30 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. –Darkwind (talk) 07:07, 30 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per the rationale above. Mccapra (talk) 07:14, 30 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 07:17, 30 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 07:17, 30 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Minnesota-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 07:17, 30 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 07:17, 30 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - It's a word in some languages, and a surname, which complicates searching, but no WP:SIGCOV found in my WP:BEFORE. FOARP (talk) 08:06, 30 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete: Although I am seeing some at-launch posts around the launch (e.g. Mashable (Jan 2008), perhaps close to meeting WP:PRODUCTREV concerns), these seem to me to be propositional coverage. My searches are not finding the substantial coverage of this venture and its closure which could demonstrate WP:NCORP or WP:NWEB notability. AllyD (talk) 09:49, 30 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - Defunct company that doesn't seem to have enough coverage at the time or after. Expertwikiguy (talk) 01:15, 31 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.