Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/LyricsFinder11

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz ^talk 03:00, 25 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

LyricsFinder11[edit]

Two reasons for this one. First, there don't seem to be a set of independent sources with significant coverage of this item, so it fails WP:N. Second, the purpose of the tool is to facilitate copyright violation by searching LyricWiki.org, a site devoted to lyric copyright violation. If notability was conclusively strong, I'd say the nature of the work was unimportant. Since the notability is weak, at best, it makes me want to deny this software any benefit of the doubt. —Kww(talk) 15:10, 15 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. I don't think the copyvio nature of the tool matters, since we have articles on quite a few bits of software that are illegal in some countries but still notable. However, this one would seem to fail WP:N. Firestorm (talk) 15:55, 15 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep The legality is irrelevant. The nom. admits that notability is there, though he thinks it weak. Requiring "conclusively strong notability" for things that one thinks illegal is a violation of NPOV. DGG (talk) 06:26, 16 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Please reread. I think it fails [WP:N]]. "Weak, at best", was being generous.—Kww(talk) 11:21, 16 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. -- fr33k man -s- 15:49, 16 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:19, 20 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete A greek blog and a company site do not establish notability. This software does not meet (WP:N). Dialectric (talk) 14:10, 20 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete There are many of these wholly nonnotable software articles on Wikipedia and its about time they get cut if they can't hold their own against WP:N. I can't find any sources to describe this particular program in any detail and I have no idea what separates it from other pieces of software, ie: what makes it notable. Themfromspace (talk) 04:42, 24 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.