Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lydia Newton

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. east.718 at 23:10, December 14, 2007

Lydia Newton[edit]

Stub article, unreferenced since creation in september, fails WP:BIO (it's a factoid rather than an article). I had been merging these stubs to List of American supercentenarians, to allow improvement a prelude to possible demeger, but the mergers have been immediately reverted by User:Kitia, so I suggest deletion instead, without prejudice to recreation if notability can be established per WP:BIO. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 17:06, 8 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete notability not established. RMHED (talk) 17:41, 8 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete or merge I suppose if we close with a merge, we can over-ride that revert. But perhaps at this point Kitia might be willing to compromise--has she been asked again whether she still objects if the alternative is deletion? DGG (talk) 16:22, 11 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.