Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lvl Prasad Lolla

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. J04n(talk page) 12:08, 9 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Lvl Prasad Lolla[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not notable. Effectively WP:TRIVIA. --Jack | ^{talk page} 04:40, 28 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Evano1van(எவனோ ஓருவன்) 06:00, 28 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Cricket-related deletion discussions. Evano1van(எவனோ ஓருவன்) 06:01, 28 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Comment He doesn't appear to be notable as a cricketer, having apparently not played a first-class (or equivalent) match. The Madras Cricket Club he played for is not the one that was renamed Tamil Nadu 1970 and plays in the Ranji Trophy, since Prasad was only a child at that time. So any notability will have to come from his commentary and punditry, which I didn't check. Dricherby (talk) 09:37, 28 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:21, 28 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:22, 28 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Certainly not notable as a cricketer per WP:CRIN, having searched for information regarding his punditry, the only conclusion I reached was even that doesn't give any form of notability per WP:GNG. Howzat?Out!Out!Out! (talk) 20:42, 29 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, J04n(talk page) 20:31, 6 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. No evidence of notability, and it's likely none is going to be found any time soon. Ducknish (talk) 00:51, 9 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.