Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lungs (song)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Courcelles 07:43, 31 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Lungs (song)[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Single does not meet the notability criteria under WP:NALBUMS. It is not covered by third-party sources, and has not charted. Last nomination was no consensus because there was no participation except by the article creator. I, Jethrobot ^{drop me a line} (note: not a bot!) 08:25, 24 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: Article was moved between AfDs. Previous AfD can be found here. I, Jethrobot ^{drop me a line} (note: not a bot!) 08:27, 24 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as per WP:NSONGS. Would suggest a redirect to the albums page (as well as copying the album specific info over), but that doesn't currently exist. Nik thestoned 09:09, 24 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 19:12, 24 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:RS and WP:NSONGS. Richwales (talk · contribs) 05:20, 28 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - does not appear to meet WP:GNG or WP:NSONGS at this time. I can find no significant coverage for this song in reliable sources; just mentions/listings at social networking pages, online retailers and lyrics sites. Gongshow ^Talk 20:21, 29 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.