Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lunch Ladies

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. RL0919 (talk) 20:27, 24 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Lunch Ladies[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not seeing significant criticism or review, other than this harvard crimson article and the film's minor award. Doesn't pass GNG or NFILM to me. theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (they/them) 07:26, 2 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (they/them) 07:26, 2 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (they/them) 07:26, 2 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Weak delete There is a little notability here but it doesn't quite seem like enough. --DanielRigal (talk) 19:54, 2 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep as has reliable sources significant coverage such as reviews in Dread Central, Film Threat and Horror Society (all rs for horror films) as linked in the list here so that WP:GNG is passed and deletion is unnecessary in my view, Atlantic306 (talk) 03:42, 9 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, it has been in many movie festivals and appears on IMDb which makes it notable enough for me. Safyrr 22:14, 19 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
From WP:NFILM: The film was given a commercial re-release, or screened in a festival, at least five years after initial release. Has that happened? And appearing on IMDb does not ensure notability. theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (they/she) 22:29, 19 December 2021 (UTC
Alright, for the IMBd thing. But, in the "Awards and nominations" section it lists several Film festivals it appeared in since its release 4 years ago and with each being tied to what looks like legit sources. Should it have more to make it notable? Safyrr 22:48, 19 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

i don't think it's quantity such as length; if it's rescreened in a year or so from now, that's another story. theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (they/she) 23:10, 19 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 08:54, 9 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 16:36, 16 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

It has three reliable sources reviews irrespective of the awards Atlantic306 (talk) 04:05, 21 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The reason it should not be deleted it’s because:

Lunch Ladies is distributed all over the world, has more than 120 film reviews and interviews, won 45 awards and was featured on France 24. Distributors included: canal + for French territories, prime video, shorts TV, curtcircuit33 in Barcelona, shotTV in Russia, osorezone in Japan, dark matter TV, Curia TV, Tubi TV, KanopyAmirv60~fawiki (talk) 10:50, 22 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.