Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lunawebs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. j⚛e decker ^talk 22:28, 9 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Lunawebs[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

1. No secondary sources fails WP:CORP 2. no assertion of notability was dePRODed but still no secondaries added in years. COI (creator) / advert. Widefox; talk 10:05, 19 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Utah-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:32, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:33, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:33, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, czar ♔ 21:36, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Don't see any claim for notability, fails WP:CORP, and an online search didn't turn up anything for me either. Looks like WP:PROMO. mikeman67 (talk) 18:59, 4 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Fails WP:CORP. -- Wikipedical (talk) 06:38, 9 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.