Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lunatic Gods
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. WP:SNOW MBisanz talk 22:49, 23 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Lunatic Gods[edit]
- Lunatic Gods (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Non-notable band, fails WP:MUSIC. Cannibaloki 18:31, 19 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Isn't notable, doesn't claim notoriety, and doesn't prove notoriety. OlYellerTalktome 19:05, 19 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Non-notable South-East7™Talk/Contribs 20:55, 19 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Fails WP:BAND in every conceivable way. Google returns lyrics pages and MP3 downloads. The speedy shouldn't have been contested to begin with. Age of an article should have no bearing on whether or not something meets the guidelines for inclusion. §FreeRangeFrog 22:13, 19 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete As far as I can see, fails WP:MUSIC. Will change opinion if sources to show coverage are found, but couldn't see any via Google. Blackmetalbaz (talk) 22:40, 19 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. -- — LinguistAtLarge • Talk 01:14, 20 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - fails notability guidelines for bands. Matt (Talk) 07:45, 21 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.