Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/LuminAID

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) DavidLeighEllis (talk) 02:14, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

LuminAID[edit]

LuminAID (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

relatively trivial invention, minor awards, and the sourcing isPR or only for the minor awards.

another article from AfC DGG ( talk ) 20:41, 7 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Illinois-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:04, 7 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:05, 7 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:05, 7 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Very weak keep at the moment. It seems that FT and BBC sources may satisfy WP:GNG. At the same time, if the winning of these minor awards stays the single event and no real progress to commercialize that product would be made, it would be better to merge into solar-powered flashlight as suggested by Someone not using his real name. Beagel (talk) 11:02, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.