Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Luke solo

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. —Quarl ^(talk) 2007-01-01 04:31Z

Luke solo[edit]

Non-notable fanfic character in the Star Wars universe. A very similar article at Luke Solo was recently deleted via PROD; I'm bringing this one to AFD so that any future incarnations can be speedied under WP:CSD#G4. FreplySpang 17:56, 27 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy Delete, and salt the earth both here and at Luke Solo. Fanfiction is generally a nice way of continuing to enjoy a series but doesn't deserve a place here. Lankybugger 18:21, 27 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, nonnotable fancruft. Even Wookieepedia doesn't have an entry so Wikipedia doesn't need one either. Inconsistent too for what it's worth, the Luke Solo article said the name is Peter Gernold, not Peter Rapp. Femto 18:24, 27 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Non-notable original research with no external citing of sources for verification. --Eqdoktor 18:48, 27 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Uber Delete, and set anyone responsible on fire per nom. Wikipedia isn't a proper venue for the self-masturbatory fantasies of fanfic wannabees. RGTraynor 19:15, 27 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete CSD:G4, recreation under miscapitalization. -Freekee 19:42, 27 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
G4 only applies when there was an earlier XfD debate, which is the reason for having this one. Femto 19:52, 27 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- - Ah. Then delete on account of subtrivial crapness. And it's still miscapitalized. -Freekee 22:52, 27 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete with light sabers - # [REDIRECT] fancruft. SkierRMH 20:49, 27 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Use the Delete Danny Lilithborne 01:58, 28 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - clearly original research. Quack 688 11:08, 29 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.