Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Luke Walton (musician)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Addhoc (talk) 20:04, 5 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Luke Walton (musician)[edit]

Prod removed, so here we are. From the prod: No evidence of charts, tours, awards, or even of any full album releases--the misleading Amazon "CD" link has no CDs (since replaced with an iTunes-only link), just six MP3s that can be downloaded separately or together. Most Ghits are on blogs, MySpace, and other 'anyone can upload' websites. Shawis (talk) 03:18, 1 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I'm sure Luke is a swell guy, but the article fails wp:band at this time. Pharmboy (talk) 03:28, 1 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, fails every aspect of WP:MUSIC -- no charted singles, no tours, no awards, no albums. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells•Otter chirps)} 03:38, 1 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Is the wrong Luke Walton to pass on WP:NOT, and fails WP:MUSIC with room to spare. WP:VANITY by all appearances. Ψν^Psi_nu 03:51, 1 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

delete Per nom, above comments Thedjatclubrock :) ^(T/C)
Torn. Is Amie Street reliable? He's been covered in that, but that's the only source. Otherwise, he's non-notable, so I guess delete. J-ſtan^Contribs_{User page} 04:00, 1 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, doesn't look like he meets WP:MUSIC. Lankiveil (talk) 04:39, 1 January 2008 (UTC).[reply]
Delete per nom.--h i s ^{s p a c e} _{r e s e a r c h} 03:04, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.