Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Luke Walker (ice hockey) (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 05:54, 14 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Luke Walker (ice hockey)[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable junior hockey player. Fails WP:NHOCKEY Larkspurs (talk) 20:18, 6 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ice hockey-related deletion discussions. —DJSasso (talk) 20:31, 6 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Not really sure this had to come to Afd when it could have just been redirected back to his father as was done in the last Afd. As such, I suggest redirecting again. -DJSasso (talk) 20:28, 6 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete fails WP:NHOCKEY. It looks like he'll be on pace to hit the 100 game threshold mid-season next year. I wouldn't oppose recreation then. I really don't understand the reasoning behind redirecting him to his father's article. TerminalPreppie (talk) 20:41, 6 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - I'd rather see a red link or no link than a redirect. Walker doesn't pass NHOCKEY right now, so I'd say delete. Canada Hky (talk) 23:14, 6 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Fails WP:NHOCKEY, of course. He's had a modest season, and many low-round young draftees in his position move on to other careers in the offseason. Ravenswing 00:54, 7 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 13:39, 8 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Per above. Patken4 (talk) 19:33, 12 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.