Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Luke Jeremy

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Michig (talk) 07:13, 24 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Luke Jeremy[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Actor who falls under way too soon, he could be notable someday. No reliable references either. Also it seems all the edits are single purpose accounts. Wgolf (talk) 01:08, 17 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as per nom, nothing much of interest found via searches. Wishing Mr. Jeremy luck, but now is not really the time. GAB^Hello! 02:02, 17 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Everymorning (talk) 03:18, 17 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as nothing convincing for WP:ENTERTAINER or any solid independent notability frankly. SwisterTwister talk 04:51, 17 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 04:54, 17 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: doesn't yet have any real indication of passing WP:NACTOR, or any real independent references at all. Can't pass WP:GNG, falls under WP:TOOSOON. — crh ₂₃ (Talk) 10:20, 17 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Wales-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:17, 23 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.