Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Luke Giverin (3rd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Fenix down (talk) 23:14, 13 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Luke Giverin[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NFOOTY as Belgian Second Division was not fully professional when Luke Giverin played for Royal Antwerp. Does not appear to meet WP:GNG either and the only article which links to this is 2016–17 Central Coast Mariners FC season although he does not appear to have ever played for. Article has been twice deleted before for similar reasons. Stevie fae Scotland (talk) 22:17, 6 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 22:20, 6 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 22:20, 6 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 22:20, 6 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 23:01, 6 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete and SALT, fails GNG and NFOOTBALL. Possible G4? Giant Snowman 09:25, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Fails NFOOTBALL. Pilean (talk) 16:56, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete and salt, as fails WP:GNG. There are some independent sources, but they look to either be local news coverage, or just interviews. GiantSnowman the last deletion discussion was 8 years ago, so I doubt that this current version is very similar to the version that was deleted, so I guess G4 doesn't apply. Joseph2302 (talk) 21:32, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete does not meet GNG.John Pack Lambert (talk) 21:38, 11 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.