Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Luke Brookshier

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. (non-admin closure) Baseball Watcher 02:28, 18 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Luke Brookshier[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article fails WP:GNG (no reliable secondary sources). Ring2011 (talk) 21:32, 23 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - insufficient notability, as above. --Whiteguru (talk) 23:36, 23 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note to closing admin The subject of this AfD was not properly tagged (or tagged at all) until 04:43, April 24 [1]. Monty ₈₄₅ 04:47, 24 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I have also notified the page creator which was not done, and removed the CSD A9, as the subject is not a musical recording. Monty ₈₄₅ 04:59, 24 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 14:38, 27 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 14:39, 27 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

delete no coverage in gnews of his role. imdb confirms he has only worked on 1 notable production. that does not get him notability. LibStar (talk) 02:51, 28 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. He was nominated for a PrimeTime Emmy Awards which is notable. Gsearch brought additional sources which have added to the page. Readorama (talk) 11:44, 30 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Logan _Talk ^{Contributions} 00:16, 1 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spartaz ^Humbug! 03:03, 9 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spartaz ^Humbug! 03:04, 9 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.