Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Luisa Zissman (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy keep (non-admin close), repeat of AfD closed days ago. Sportfan5000 (talk) 01:27, 5 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Luisa Zissman[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Doesn't meet notability requirements. Has appeared on reality TV twice, winning nothing. Her business is not notable. Her personal life is not notable other than in the tabloids for having a high sex drive which she appears content to flaunt in the media. Is that a valid mark of notability? This is a WP:FANCRUFT article. Leaky Caldron 10:10, 4 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I was unaware until the page compiled that this junk was voted to be kept yesterday. Shame, it is utter dross. Can an Admin. please close this as a duplicate? Leaky Caldron 10:15, 4 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I created this as a redirect as she was a runner-up on The Apprentice so thought it would be useful in that respect, but this shouldn't be an article. Like you say, it's utter dross and she's not notable for anything significant. Paul MacDermott (talk) 11:14, 4 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep We closed this yesterday with consensus. I think it was marginal then - but what's done is done and to delete would be wp:DRV Neonchameleon (talk) 01:04, 5 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.