Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ludwig Wörl

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Geschichte (talk) 07:11, 29 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ludwig Wörl[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

While heroic, not enough in-depth sourcing from independent reliable sources to show they pass notability. Fails WP:GNG. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 03:43, 22 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 10:03, 22 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 10:03, 22 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comment The German Wikipedia version, Ludwig_Wörl, includes a number of German and French language references. At least, "Hermann Langbein: Menschen in Auschwitz. Frankfurt am Main/Berlin/Wien 1980" has been translated into English and provides significant coverage of Wörl, see (Langbein, tr. Zohn 2004) People in Auschwitz, University of North Carolina Press, pp. 31, 33, 45, 219, 262, 361, 432, 489-490. 24.151.121.140 (talk) 19:59, 22 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, lots of coverage in English and in German. —Kusma (t·c) 09:57, 23 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- clearly a significant person. Peterkingiron (talk) 17:09, 26 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.