Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Luddenham United
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete due to lack of notability. пﮟოьεԻ 57 21:15, 12 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Luddenham United[edit]
- Luddenham United (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
This is an article on an amateur football team with no evidence of notability presented. Grahame (talk) 05:50, 8 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. —Grahame (talk) 05:50, 8 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. —Grahame (talk) 05:53, 8 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football related deletions. ChrisTheDude (talk) 10:34, 8 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete An article of this kind could be written about every sporting club in Australia. This article does not demonstrate any notability about Luddenham United, notwithstanding that Zeljko Kalac, now of AC Milan, once played for the club. WP articles exist for the routine listing of participating clubs. Dolphin51 (talk) 02:09, 9 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. GiantSnowman 10:34, 11 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge anything salvageable to NSW Conference League South. Although, based on their 2007 results, they might not be in that comp much longer, either. Lankiveil (speak to me) 12:00, 11 August 2008 (UTC).[reply]
- Delete. This team plays in the fourth highest level in Australia. Such club cannot be considered really notable enough, unless it has played at higher level previously (the article does not state so). Julius Sahara (talk) 16:26, 11 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.