Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lucy Grantham

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. "Nothing is gained from deletion" is not a policy-based rationale to keep, especially in the face of a lack of in-depth sources. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 07:28, 15 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Lucy Grantham[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Lack of WP:SIGCOV – subject does not meet WP:NACTOR, which requires "significant roles in multiple notable films". Article (which has been tagged since 2018) could be redirected to The Last House on the Left (1972 film), her only notable role. Muzilon (talk) 10:15, 31 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Muzilon (talk) 10:15, 31 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect per nom, very notable movie, but actor did not have sustained career. Caro7200 (talk) 15:12, 31 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 01:31, 1 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete a non-notable actress.John Pack Lambert (talk) 20:29, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - notable enough, and nothing is gained by deletion. Ivanvector (^Talk/_Edits) 00:24, 7 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: Significant coverage is limited to her role in just one film (Last House). A couple of trivial mentions of her work on obscure low-budget/porn movies does not meet the threshold of WP:NACTOR, which requires significant roles in multiple notable films. Muzilon (talk) 01:19, 7 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Naypta ☺ | ✉ talk page | 22:04, 7 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: I'm not sure why a relist is necessary. 2 votes to redirect (including me as nominator), 1 to delete, and only 1 to keep. Nobody has attempted to improve the article (which has had a "notability" tag for two years) with references to reliable sources – probably because such sources don't exist. Consensus is to redirect. Muzilon (talk) 22:19, 8 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Non-notable actor. I don't see the point of redirect when she has done so little and is so little know. scope_creep^Talk 23:56, 14 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.