Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lucky (In My Life)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. L Faraone 01:28, 26 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Lucky (In My Life)[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I'm actually a big fan of most of Eiffel 65's music, and I've been willing to improve at least one Eiffel 65 article up to GA status. However, this is yet one of those articles that yet has great commercial performance, but unfortunatly can't be on Wikipedia. When trying to improve this, I couldn't really find any independent sources about this song. Yes, there's release, critical reception, etc. and it did good on the charts, but this article and what I was looking for about this song bares independent sources. I'm hoping someone can add more in-depth info from independent sources and critically published opinions of this topic that's enough to be here and so I can withdraw this discussion. EditorE (talk) 02:43, 9 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Italy-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:42, 9 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:42, 9 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, czar · · 03:45, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. It charted in several countries, so it passes WP:NSONG. Erpert ^{Who is this guy? | Wanna talk about it?} 07:03, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Another one that clearly has sufficient significance to be covered. Merging may be a possibility, deletion is out of the question. --Michig (talk) 07:57, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. May pass WP:NSONG, but not WP:GNG. And the song is only ever mentioned in reviews of the album as a whole, which WP:NSONG says isn't sufficient to establish notability. DoctorKubla (talk) 08:57, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep/Merge clearly passes NSONG and probably fails GNG but deletion is not even an option, maybe we could merge the content with the article about the album (I am definitely neutral about that), but this is just editorial matter and could be discussed in the proper places (ie talk pages). Cavarrone 09:41, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.