Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lucid Desktop

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Arbitrarily0 ^(talk) 01:10, 1 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Lucid Desktop[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

unimportant web product sourced to self-published sources and press release reprints. SchmuckyTheCat (talk) 17:11, 16 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: Like a user left on your talk page, what is "self-published sources" and who are you to deem something "unimportant". This seems like an irresponsible AfD to me. You initially added a PROD (deleting such pages after 7 days if no objections are raised), then waited 2 days, then added an AfD. Message from XENU^{complaints? leave me a message!} 19:01, 19 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: I can't find significant coverage for this software. Joe Chill (talk) 22:08, 16 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Strong Keep: It's a member of the Dojo Foundation, was featured in ComputerWorld, Ajaxian and is mentioned in a few other online articles. If needed, I'll add further citations (there's more on the Internet if you bother looking). Message from XENU^{complaints? leave me a message!} 18:46, 19 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: There's no real benefit to deleting it, plus it seems notable enough, as Xenu mentioned. 71.190.222.220 (talk) 21:01, 19 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

only edit from this IP

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, –Juliancolton | ^Talk 01:13, 24 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 20:31, 24 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Google News search results yield no substantial coverage, and nothing outside the IT field. - Smerdis of Tlön (talk) 20:47, 25 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Can't find significant coverage LoudHowie (talk) 15:17, 26 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Notice to closing Administrator: This account has only been used for modifying AfD discussions. See user's contributions. Message from XENU^{complaints? leave me a message!} 20:46, 27 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.