Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lucian Armstrong

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. --BDD (talk) 22:35, 13 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Lucian Armstrong[edit]

Lucian Armstrong (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not notable. Lacks coverage in multiple independent reliable sources. One NZ Catholic obit [1] is not enough. One of a glut of articles on seemingly non notable St Peter's College old boys. Wikipedia is not a webhost for a collection bios of a schools former students. duffbeerforme (talk) 09:35, 6 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of New Zealand-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 01:12, 7 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 01:12, 7 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 01:13, 7 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete no evidence of real notability. No in depth coverage in independent sources. If such sources are added to the article, feel free to ping my talk page. Stuartyeates (talk) 19:47, 7 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete The mere 3 lines on his ministry says it all: clearly NN. Peterkingiron (talk) 23:48, 7 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete 84-word obituary does not suggest notability. The other sources, except maybe one, are not clearly significant coverage. -- Green Cardamom (talk) 20:25, 9 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.