Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lucas Bean

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Geschichte (talk) 18:48, 5 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Lucas Bean[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Promotional article. Non-notable businessman. Fails WP:GNG. Edwardx (talk) 16:35, 26 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 16:46, 26 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User:EdwardX. Thank you for the review of my first article. The person in this article is very well known within the technology industry and on Twitter. Would additional sources make the content notable? Including news articles from industry and mainstream media outlets. SunshineState86 --SunshineState86 (talk) 08:49, 27 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@SunshineState86, we require significant coverage in multiple reliable, independent sources (?) to justify dedicated articles on Wikipedia. The Atari article is a press release. Entrepreneur is not a significant discussion of the subject. And the remaining refs are primary sources. czar 05:45, 3 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@SunshineState86: 'Lucas Bean' does not appear to even have a verified Twitter account, how could he possibly be notable via Twitter? —FORMALDUDE ^(talk) 05:30, 5 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Connecticut-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 12:20, 27 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete as spam of non-notable person. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 01:26, 28 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Comment This page has been moved into Draft space at Draft:Lucas Bean. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:33, 30 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 00:15, 4 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete This is totally a spam/advert article about a clearly non-notable person. There's nothing about it whatsoever that passes the notability guidelines. --Adamant1 (talk) 00:29, 4 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Delete for [A7]. Article about a real person that does not credibly indicate the importance or significance of the subject. —FORMALDUDE ^(talk) 05:30, 5 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Comment. I could find sth. about him, but if he is really notable, more sources would be available.Tec Tom (talk) 15:14, 5 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.