Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Luca Servo

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. clear consensus DGG ( talk ) 20:37, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Luca Servo[edit]

Luca Servo (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Quite questionably notable and improvable and is easily speedy and PROD material with my searches finding nothing better at all other than this and this hasn't changed much since starting in October 2007. Pinging author Neoluk. SwisterTwister talk 07:10, 22 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 07:12, 22 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 07:12, 22 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 07:12, 22 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Italy-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 07:12, 22 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 07:12, 22 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. Unable to find any significant media coverage, so he fails GNG and BIO. Clarityfiend (talk) 08:25, 22 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Article text taken pretty much verbatim from his "about me" on his blog. No third-party sources. LaMona (talk) 15:03, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - Fails WP:GNG and WP:BIO per search results. I didn't do a copyvio, but if LaMona's comment is correct, could have been CSD'd. Onel5969 TT me 20:37, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.