Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lu'an Public Security Bureau

This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Delete. R e dwolf24 (talk) 02:21, 25 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Lu'an Public Security Bureau[edit]

I move for a deletion, this is tragic if this is verifiable but Wikipedia at this point should not be used as a forum for venting out propaganda. Even the article's text is questionable: "...allegedly has persecuted Christians severely.", allegedly? Either it happened or it did not happened. Topics like this can be discussed on the proper forums but not Wikipedia, for this same reason mentioned earlier, Wikipedia is NOT a means of publishing propaganda, that is NOT the purpose of Wikipedia. 129.2.237.44

This is a series of articles by the same user serving an identical purpose. See Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shijiazhuang Public Security Bureau, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tangshan Public Security Bureau, and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Changchun Public Security Bureau. --Mib orovsky 22:36, 16 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Weak Delete The second portion is POV unless there's an outside neutral source to verify(I don't think that church link counts), and without that second part, it's close to non-notable anyway. Karmafist 12:57, 16 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I move for a deletion because the article seems non-notable. Abstrakt 14:24, 16 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Non-notable ? The police etc. administration of many thousands is notable. Sarcelles 20:37, 16 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

-Comment to Sarcelles: Why you are still trying to push your agenda is beyond me, in the past you have admitted to being banned on the Italian, French and German wikipedias for your own edits. You have admitted that you know little to nothing on the topics you edit and that you just copy your edits off of various websites. Abstrakt 17:18, 18 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Delete nn. — Phil Welch 21:59, 16 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Creator has previous soapbox tendencies. History of selectively including information to push an agenda. --Mib orovsky 22:45, 16 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.