Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lowendalmasai

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. The Bushranger _{One ping only} 02:36, 30 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Lowendalmasai[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable business, with this ~~article~~ advertisement written by someone with significant WP:COI. Wholly promotional in nature (✉→BWilkins←✎) 12:43, 16 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Altered Walter (talk) 13:13, 16 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, no assertion of notability per WP:CORP, no significant coverage online from WP:Reliable sources. I've tried repeatedly to tone down the promotional tone in the article, but my edits keep getting reverted, apparently by a marketing intern at the company. That can be fixed, but the notability issue remains. Altered Walter (talk) 12:50, 16 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of France-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISPEANUTBUTTER☆★ 15:40, 17 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Courcelles 02:20, 23 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

By all accounts Delete, there is no independent 3rd party reference to be found. Alfy32 (talk) 02:43, 23 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.