Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Loves Me Not

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Redirect to Dangerous and Moving. I am making this decision because there isn't really too much in this article to merge with Dangerous and Moving, considering the content that's already in it. OTOH, redirecting still leaves the content in history, if someone finds something of value to merge in the future. Deathphoenix 14:45, 9 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Loves Me Not[edit]

  • I have seen no confirmation of this being the 3rd single anywhere else on the internet, not to mention the page is a mess. - RHeodt 21:21, 26 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • This afd nomination was orphaned. Listing now. —Crypticbot (operator) 15:24, 27 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete WP not a crystal ball, etc. Ruby 16:02, 27 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete WP:NOT] a crystal ball. --Terence Ong (恭喜发财) 16:05, 27 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep whether or not WP is not a crystal ball... it is a charted song in parts of europe as well as Japan. It has earned its right to a stub.  ALKIVAR™ 13:24, 1 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Well in that case, why haven't you edited the article? The article says it's a possible maybe future release. --kingboyk 03:00, 4 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    • Oh and now that I think about it... "the page is a mess" means you put a {{Cleanup}} tag on it ... not VFD it.  ALKIVAR™ 01:01, 2 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
This AfD is being relisted to generate a clearer consensus. Please add new discussion below this notice. Thanks!
Deathphoenix 01:15, 3 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. Not released until April 2006 according to article. A search of Top 40 charts which has charts from throughout the world came up empty. I would suggest merging with Dangerous and Moving, the relevant album except we don't have an article on it yet. In these circumstances, agreed policy is to merge with Dangerous and Moving, the relevant article. Capitalistroadster 03:23, 3 February 2006 (UTC)Capitalistroadster 03:17, 3 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Merge to Dangerous and Moving -- Astrokey44|talk 05:54, 3 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete it doesn't exist yet, it doesn't get an article unless it is something like an upcoming election or olympics that is sure to happen. Peyna 14:53, 3 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete There's no evidence provided that it has charted anywhere, according to Capitalistroadster. We lose nothing by deleting this stub of an article. No doubt it will be recreated if and when this song is released as a single in the English speaking world. Personally, I'm more interested in their videos :) --kingboyk 03:03, 4 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete as Wikipedia is not a crystal ball. Stifle 01:19, 5 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]


The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Loves_Me_Not&oldid=1138036110"