Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Louis Velazquez

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Kurykh (talk) 05:59, 3 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Louis Velazquez[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I don't think the subject is notable per WP:GNG. The content is the work of User:Highflyerzone and I suspect a close connection to the subject and possible autobiography. This is one of those articles that cites a lot of sources, but those sources do little more than prove the subject exists. They do not establish the significant coverage required for GNG. – Muboshgu (talk) 17:55, 25 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You are absolutely incorrect with your assumption, this article is suitable for inclusion so I dispute your claims User:Muboshgu — Preceding unsigned comment added by Highflyerzone (talk • contribs) 13:49, 28 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. – Muboshgu (talk) 17:55, 25 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. – Muboshgu (talk) 17:55, 25 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: Same subject was once deleted under Falcon Coperis on a prod with the same GNG concerns. MPJ-DK 15:36, 26 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- Well whaddyaknow. – Muboshgu (talk) 18:09, 26 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Wrestling-related deletion discussions. Nikki♥311 03:10, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Fails WP:GNG and WP:NSPORT, lots of mentions but no substantial reliable sources. "Falcon Coperis" is also a non-notable wrestler. Reads like an autobiography and is almost the whole editing input of User:Highflyerzone. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 14:34, 29 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
REPLY - In response to User:Cwmhiraeth and their vote for a DELETE, YES User:Highflyerzone wrote the article and YES Wikipedia asked for more details so what was known was added, Wikipedia is driven by community contributions and I don't know what was on here prior, I do know what I added,which in my opinion is suitable for inclusion, this is why I put the time in to add it and will continue to contribute to Wikipedia. Let me note that the entertainment and business part of that article is what is notable not the wrestling part of it. comment added by Highflyerzone (talk • contribs) 09:35, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.